Not every problem needs
classic staff augmentation
A software house often needs an expert only for a closed problem: slow Java/Spring application, legacy, CI/CD, or observability.
Your senior is needed
on the client's roadmap
Pulling a key person away from delivery for weeks rarely works. A closed performance or legacy problem is often better handled by a subcontractor.
The client sees symptoms,
not the root cause
Slow endpoints, long-running batches, unstable deployments — before promising a larger project, it helps to have a technical diagnosis.
The client relationship
should stay with you
We can work under your brand or transparently as a technical expert. You decide how communication with the end client should look.
Recommended for closed scopes: audit, review, optimization sprint, or legacy support.
Closed topics
instead of a permanent bench
You define the client's problem and expected outcome. We choose the scope: report, audit, sprint, or expert review.
Quick technical
review
A short diagnosis of a concrete problem: read-only repository, heap dump, logs, metrics, or a pipeline fragment. A good first step before a client proposal.
- Initial bottleneck diagnosis
- Recommended next scope
- White-label report option
- No client relationship takeover
JVM and performance
audit
A full diagnosis for Java/Spring applications: AI-assisted code analysis, JVM profiling, Hibernate, SQL, CI/CD, and a repair roadmap.
- Baseline and repository analysis
- Prioritized fixes and estimates
- Material for CTO or end client
- Optional team walkthrough
€3,500–€4,500
Schedule ConsultationOptimization
sprint
A closed implementation stage after the audit: Hibernate, SQL, GC, caching, CI/CD, observability, or legacy modernization.
- Scope and metrics agreed before start
- Work with your team or under your brand
- Before/after impact reporting
- Change documentation and knowledge transfer
from €5,000
Let's TalkHow do we start cooperation?
From first conversation to agreed scope —
without promising a permanent bench or long staff augmentation.
Problem qualification
You describe the client project, symptoms, stack, and contractual constraints. We decide whether it fits an audit, sprint, or short review.
Safe access
We agree on the minimum needed access: read-only repo, logs, metrics, heap dump, or a pipeline fragment. The client relationship stays on your side.
Diagnosis or sprint
We deliver a report, recommendations, or implementation in the agreed scope. The material can be white-label or discussed jointly with the client.
Next closed stage
If the issue requires implementation, we plan the next scope: performance fixes, CI/CD, observability, or legacy modernization.
Why subcontracting
instead of a bench?
Your seniors stay on delivery
You hand us a closed performance or legacy problem, while your team keeps delivering the client's roadmap.
Cost fits the scope
We price a report, review, or sprint. This fits overflow work better than a long staffing contract.
Narrow JVM/performance expertise
We complement your team where the problem is specialized: GC, Hibernate, SQL, CI/CD, observability, or legacy.
Client relationship stays with you
We can work under your brand or transparently as a technical expert. You decide the communication model.
Have a client project that needs JVM/performance expertise?
Let's discuss a closed scope: audit, optimization sprint, or white-label review for your software house.
Book a diagnostic call